PaperPanorama

Nuclear Experiment·nucl-ex

Fri·Jun 2, 2017

2 papers—2 primary·0 cross-listed·reconstructed*

  1. 01*

    Atomic masses of intermediate-mass neutron-deficient nuclei with relative uncertainty down to 35-ppb via multireflection time-of-flight mass spectrograph

    S. Kimura🇯🇵 · Y. Ito🇯🇵 · D. Kaji🇯🇵 · P. Schury🇯🇵 · M. Wada🇯🇵 · H. Haba🇯🇵 · T. Hashimoto🇰🇷 · Y. Hirayama🇯🇵 · M. MacCormick🇫🇷 · H. Miyatake🇯🇵 · J. Y. Moon🇰🇷 · K. Morimoto🇯🇵 and 9 other authors

    High-precision mass measurements of Cu, Zn, Ga, Ge, As, Br, Rb, and Sr were performed utilizing a multireflection time-of-flight mass spectrograph combined with the gas-filled recoil ion separator GARIS-II. In the case of Ga, a mass uncertainty of 2.1 keV, corresponding to a relative precision of , was obtained and the mass value is in excellent agreement with the 2016 Atomic Mass Evaluation. For Ge and Br, where masses were previously deduced through indirect measurements, discrepancies with literature values were found. The feasibility of using this device for mass measurements of nuclides more neutron-deficient side, which have significant impact on the -process pathway, is discussed.

    nucl-exInt.J.Mass Spectrometry(2018)·19 citations
  2. 02*

    Precision measurement of the -asymmetry in spin-polarized decay

    B. Fenker · A. Gorelov · D. Melconian🇺🇸 · J.A. Behr · M. Anholm · D. Ashery · R.S. Behling · I. Cohen · I. Craiciu · G. Gwinner🇨🇦 · J. McNeil · M. Mehlman and 4 other authors

    Using TRIUMF's neutral atom trap, TRINAT, for nuclear decay, we have measured the asymmetry with respect to the initial nuclear spin in to be , a 0.3% measurement. This is the best relative accuracy of any -asymmetry measurement in a nucleus or the neutron, and is in agreement with the standard model prediction . We compare constraints on physics beyond the standard model with other -decay measurements, and improve the value of measured in this mirror nucleus by a factor of 4.

    nucl-exPRL(2018)·55 citations

* Reconstructed cohort: no mailing for this day survives in the archive. Papers are grouped by their submission times and arXiv's announcement cut-off, assuming announcement without delay; positions follow identifier order. Validated at ~91% exact-day agreement against the archived era.