PaperPanorama

arXiv:hep-ph/0512268·v3·High Energy Physics — Phenomenology

Implications for new physics from and

Jian-Feng Cheng🇨🇳 · Yuan-Ning Gao🇨🇳 · Chao-Shang Huang🇨🇳 · Xiao-Hong Wu🇰🇷

PDFarXivINSPIREDOI

Abstract

We have analyzed the puzzle in three kinds of models beyond the standard model (SM). It is shown that the minimal flavor violation (MFV) models, the minimal supersymmetric standard model (MSSM), and the two Higgs doublet models (2HDM) I and II can not give an explanation of the puzzle within experimental bounds and the model III 2HDM can explain the puzzle without a conflict with other experimental measurements. If the constraint on from is not imposed, for all kinds of insertions considered there are regions of parameter space, where the scalar quark mass is larger (much larger) than the gluino mass in the case of LR or RL (LL or RR), in which the puzzle can be resolved within experimental bounds.

Comments: 7 pages, 3 eps files. Add some more explicit analysis version appeared in PLB

Citation historyopen in Citation History ↗