On the Origins of the Strong CP Problem

Abstract

The conventional strong $CP$ problem arises from the tension between an unrestricted physical parameter $\bar{\theta }$ and the experimental constraint $|\bar{\theta }|\lesssim 10^{-10}$. In the standard formulation, a global topological classification of gauge-field configuration space leads to integer-valued sectors, $\theta$-vacua, and $\theta$ as a physical vacuum angle. Alternatively, a physical flavor-singlet pseudoscalar phase may be introduced through the quark mass matrix. The axial anomaly relates these descriptions through the invariant combination $\bar{\theta }=\theta +\arg \det M$. We ask the logically prior question of whether known physical principles or observables require the introduction of an independent physical flavor-singlet $CP$-violating parameter in QCD. We distinguish consequences of local gauge invariance and causal locality from those requiring additional global assumptions or the introduction of a physical flavor-singlet $CP$-violating parameter. For constant $\theta$, the topological charge density is a total four-divergence with no local variational response to compactly supported field variations, and a nonzero $\theta$ coupling is not required by perturbative renormalization. No established QCD phenomenology requires a physical $\bar{\theta }$ parameter. Without such a parameter, the topological susceptibility, axial anomaly, 't~Hooft vertex, Leutwyler--Smilga and Witten--Veneziano relations, standard lattice QCD results, semiclassical instanton solutions, and established phenomenological successes of QCD all remain. Nothing prevents the introduction of $\bar{\theta }$ as an independent physical parameter, which is consistent with these same QCD results. In this sense, establishing that the strong $CP$ problem is an \emph{unavoidable} feature of QCD requires showing why a physical $\bar{\theta }$ parameter is \emph{required}, rather than merely allowed.

Comments: 39 pages, 1 figure