PaperPanorama

arXiv:2211.05136·v2·High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena

Physics Beyond the Standard Model with Future X-ray Observatories: Projected Constraints on Very-Light Axion-Like Particles with and

Júlia Sisk-Reynés🇬🇧 · Christopher S. Reynolds🇬🇧 · Michael L. Parker🇬🇧 · James H. Matthews🇬🇧 · M.C. David Marsh🇸🇪

PDFarXivINSPIREDOI

Abstract

Axion-Like Particles (ALPs) are well-motivated extensions of the Standard Model of Particle Physics and a generic prediction of some string theories. X-ray observations of bright Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) hosted by rich clusters of galaxies are excellent probes of very-light ALPs, with masses . We evaluate the potential of future X-ray observatories, particularly and the proposed , to constrain ALPs via observations of cluster-hosted AGN, taking NGC 1275 in the Perseus cluster as our exemplar. Assuming perfect knowledge of instrument calibration, we show that a modest exposure (200-ks) of NGC 1275 by permits us to exclude all photon-ALP couplings at the 95% level, as previously shown by , representing a factor of 10 improvement over current limits. We then proceed to assess the impact of realistic calibration uncertainties on the projection by applying a standard likelihood procedure, showing the projected constraints on weaken by a factor of 10 (back to the current most sensitive constraints). However, we show how the use of a deep neural network can disentangle the energy-dependent features induced by instrumental miscalibration and those induced by photon-ALP mixing, allowing us to recover most of the sensitivity to the ALP physics. In our explicit demonstration, the machine learning applied allows us to exclude , complementing the projected constraints of next-generation ALP dark matter birefringent cavity searches for very-light ALPs. Finally, we show that a 200-ks /on-axis observation of NGC 1275 will tighten the current best constraints on very-light ALPs by a factor of 3.

Comments: 22 pages, 10 figures, 3 tables. Accepted for publication at the Astrophysical Journal. Comments welcome

Citation historyopen in Citation History ↗