PaperPanorama

arXiv:1607.07907·v3·High Energy Physics — Phenomenology

Simple Mass Estimate for Resonance(s) being 6 Top plus 6 Anti top Bound states and Combinations thereof

Holger Bech Nielsen🇩🇰

PDFarXivINSPIREDOI

Abstract

We have long speculated \cite{1nbs,2nbs,3nbs,4nbs,5nbs, 6nbs,7nbs,8nbs,9nbs,10nbs,11nbs,12nbs, 13nbs,14nbs,LNvacuumstability} , that 6 top + 6 anti-top quarks due to the realtively large size of the top-yukawa coupling would bind exceptionaly strongly by mainly Higgs exchange. Here we present a surprisingly simple "calculation" of the mass of this speculated bound state. Even a possible resonance in scattering of two such bound states is speculated. For the "calculation" of the masses it is crucial to assume, that our since long speculated principle "Multiple Point Principle"\cite{5mp,6mp,7mp,8mp,9mp,10mp, 11mp,12mp,13mp,14mp,15mp,16mp,17mp, deriving}, is true. This principle says: {\em there are several vacua all having almost zero energy density}. Further we make an approximation of the Higgs Yukawa potential essentially replacing the exponential in it by a step-function. The new result means that there are now two independent calls for our bound state having the mass around 750 GeV required by our "new law of nature" the Multiple Point Principle. It should be remarked that in our picture there is {\em no new physics} in the sense of new fundamental particles, but the "Multiple Point Principle" is new in the sense of being not yet accepted. Further we get the {\em same} mass within uncertainties as earlier\cite{LNvacuumstability} but now from a completly different assumption, except for being from our "multiple point principle". But the two masses are gotten from using {\em different} (speculative) vacua occuring in the pure Standard Model.

Comments: a bit corrected etc because of the death of the F(750) digamma fluctuation, now even more relation to late F(750) removed so that essentially nothing left about this fluctuation. But the coincidence of the estimated mass for the bound state - still called F - in the present article with the one obtainable from aprevious article is a highly remarkable coincidence suggesting truth of our articles!

Citation historyopen in Citation History ↗