PaperPanorama

Nuclear Theory·nucl-th

Wednesday·May 28, 2025

8 papers2 primary·6 cross-listed

  1. 03

    Observation of hadron scattering in a lattice gauge theory on a quantum computer

    Julian Schuhmacher🇨🇭 · Guo-Xian Su🇺🇸 · Jesse J. Osborne🇩🇪 · Anthony Gandon🇨🇭 · Jad C. Halimeh🇩🇪 · Ivano Tavernelli🇨🇭

    Scattering experiments are at the heart of high-energy physics (HEP), breaking matter down to its fundamental constituents, probing its formation, and providing deep insight into the inner workings of nature. In the current huge drive to forge quantum computers into complementary venues that are ideally suited to capture snapshots of far-from-equilibrium HEP dynamics, a major goal is to utilize these devices for scattering experiments. A major obstacle in this endeavor has been the hardware overhead required to access the late-time post-collision dynamics while implementing the underlying gauge symmetry. Here, we report on the first quantum simulation of scattering in a lattice gauge theory (LGT), performed on \texttt{IBM}'s \texttt{ibm\_marrakesh} quantum computer. Specifically, we quantum-simulate the collision dynamics of electrons and positrons as well as mesons in a LGT representing D quantum electrodynamics (QED), uncovering rich post-collision dynamics that we can precisely tune with a topological -term and the fermionic mass. By monitoring the time evolution of the scattering processes, we are able to distinguish between two main regimes in the wake of the collision. The first is characterized by the delocalization of particles when the topological -term is weak, while the second regime shows localized particles with a clear signature when the -term is nontrivial. Furthermore, we show that by quenching to a small mass at the collision point, inelastic scattering occurs with a large production of matter reminiscent of quantum many-body scarring. Our work provides a major step forward in the utility of quantum computers for investigating the real-time quantum dynamics of HEP collisions.

    quant-phcond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.str-elhep-lat+171 citations
  2. 04

    Quantum computation of hadron scattering in a lattice gauge theory

    Zohreh Davoudi🇺🇸 · Chung-Chun Hsieh🇺🇸 · Saurabh V. Kadam🇺🇸

    We present a digital quantum computation of two-hadron scattering in a lattice gauge theory in 1+1 dimensions. We prepare well-separated single-particle wave packets with desired momentum-space wavefunctions, and simulate their collision through digitized time evolution. Multiple hadronic wave packets can be produced using the efficient, systematically improvable algorithm of this work, achieving high fidelity with the target initial state. Specifically, employing a trapped-ion quantum computer (IonQ Forte), we prepare up to three meson wave packets using 11 and 27 system qubits, and simulate collision dynamics of two meson wave packets for the smaller system. Results for local observables are consistent with numerical simulations at early times, but decoherence effects limit evolution into long times. We demonstrate the critical role of high-fidelity initial states for precision measurements of state-sensitive observables, such as -matrix elements. Our work establishes the potential of quantum computers in simulating hadron-scattering processes in strongly interacting gauge theories.

    quant-phhep-lathep-phnucl-th69 citations
  3. 05

    Mapping the transverse spin sum rule in position space

    Cédric Lorcé🇫🇷 · Asmita Mukherjee🇮🇳 · Ravi Singh🇮🇳 · Ho-Yeon Won🇫🇷

    We discuss in detail the relativistic spatial distribution of transverse angular momentum, including both orbital and intrinsic spin contributions. Using the quantum phase-space formalism, we begin with the definition of the three-dimensional spatial distributions of transverse orbital angular momentum and intrinsic spin in a generic Lorentz frame. By integrating these three-dimensional spatial distributions over the longitudinal axis, we derive for the first time the relativistic spatial distributions of transverse orbital angular momentum, intrinsic spin, and total angular momentum for spin-0 and spin-1/2 targets in the transverse plane. We verify the transverse spin sum rule about the relativistic center of spin for spin-0 and spin-1/2 systems, and find that the transverse total angular momentum distribution is non-trivial, even for spin-0 targets. We also show how the distributions of transverse orbital angular momentum, intrinsic spin, and total angular momentum change with the target momentum.

    hep-phhep-thnucl-thPLB(2025)·5 citations
  4. 06

    Integrable Non-Holonomic Constraints and Gauge Fixing in Classical Field Theory

    Ben Bert🇿🇦 · William A. Horowitz🇿🇦

    We re-examine the derivation of the equations of motion from an action principle for classical field theories with non-holonomic constraints, \textit{i.e.}, constraints involving derivatives of the fields. We find that the usual method for gauge fixing in classical and quantum field theories is highly non-trivial for non-holonomic gauge constraints, such as the Coulomb and Lorenz gauges. The subtlety appears at the use of the so-called transposition rule, , which has been shown not to hold for general non-holonomic constraints in the point-particle context. We provide a sufficient definition of integrable non-holonomic constraints in classical field theory that allows us to prove that the transposition rule holds for all theories with these constraints; we are then able to recover the usual treatment of gauge fixing for gauges of this type.

    hep-thhep-phmath-phmath.MP+11 citation
  5. 07

    Entanglement Negativity of Spin-Orbit Correlations in a general Qubit-Qudit Setup

    Sanskriti Agrawal🇮🇳 · Raktim Abir🇮🇳

    We present the complete eigenvalue spectrum of the partially transposed density matrix for a pure bipartite quantum state acting on a generic Hilbert space. The spectrum contains four non-zero eigenvalues, as, \begin{eqnarray} \lambda_{1,2}=\pm \sqrt{A}, ~~~ \lambda_{3,4}= \frac{1}{2}(1\pm\sqrt{1-4 A}), \nonumber \end{eqnarray} where is the determinant of the reduced density matrix (traced over the larger subspace). As , only one is negative among the four non-trivial eigenvalues. Within this qubit-qudit framework, we further studied the negativity as a measure of entanglement for the case of spin-orbit correlation of partons inside a proton. The entanglement negativity for spin-orbit correlations is found to be related to the gluon helicity PDF and the Hermitian angle of the associated Hilbert space for linearly polarized protons.

    hep-phnucl-thquant-phPLB(2025)·6 citations
  6. 08

    The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model: an update

    R. Aliberti🇩🇪 · T. Aoyama🇯🇵 · E. Balzani🇮🇹 · A. Bashir🇲🇽 · G. Benton🇺🇸 · J. Bijnens🇸🇪 · V. Biloshytskyi🇩🇪 · T. Blum🇺🇸 · D. Boito🇧🇷 · M. Bruno🇮🇹 · E. Budassi🇮🇹 · S. Burri🇨🇭 and 223 other authors

    We present the current Standard Model (SM) prediction for the muon anomalous magnetic moment, , updating the first White Paper (WP20) [1]. The pure QED and electroweak contributions have been further consolidated, while hadronic contributions continue to be responsible for the bulk of the uncertainty of the SM prediction. Significant progress has been achieved in the hadronic light-by-light scattering contribution using both the data-driven dispersive approach as well as lattice-QCD calculations, leading to a reduction of the uncertainty by almost a factor of two. The most important development since WP20 is the change in the estimate of the leading-order hadronic-vacuum-polarization (LO HVP) contribution. A new measurement of the cross section by CMD-3 has increased the tensions among data-driven dispersive evaluations of the LO HVP contribution to a level that makes it impossible to combine the results in a meaningful way. At the same time, the attainable precision of lattice-QCD calculations has increased substantially and allows for a consolidated lattice-QCD average of the LO HVP contribution with a precision of about 0.9%. Adopting the latter in this update has resulted in a major upward shift of the total SM prediction, which now reads (530 ppb). When compared against the current experimental average based on the E821 experiment and runs 1-6 of E989 at Fermilab, one finds , which implies that there is no tension between the SM and experiment at the current level of precision. The final precision of E989 (127 ppb) is the target of future efforts by the Theory Initiative. The resolution of the tensions among data-driven dispersive evaluations of the LO HVP contribution will be a key element in this endeavor.

    hep-phhep-exhep-latnucl-ex+1Phys.Rept.(2025)·344 citations

Affiliations

first authorsco-authorsvia INSPIRE