PaperPanorama
FAQ

Nuclear Theory·nucl-th

Monday·April 10, 2023

8 papers—2 primary·6 cross-listed

All8Primary2Cross-lists6
  1. 01

    Revisiting proton-proton fusion in chiral effective field theory

    Bijaya Acharya🇺🇸 · Laura Elisa Marcucci🇮🇹 · Lucas Platter🇺🇸

    We calculate the -factor for proton-proton fusion using chiral effective field theory interactions and currents. By performing order-by-order calculations with a variety of chiral interactions that are regularized and calibrated in different ways, we assess the uncertainty in the -factor from the truncation of the effective field theory expansion and from the sensitivity of the -factor to the short-distance axial current determined from three- and four-nucleon observables. We find that where the three uncertainties arise, respectively, from the truncation of the effective field theory expansion, use of the two-nucleon axial current fit to few-nucleon observables and variation of the axial coupling constant within the recommended range. The increased value of compared to previous calculations is mainly driven by an increase in the recommended value for the axial coupling constant and is in agreement with a recent analysis based on pionless effective field theory.

    nucl-thastro-ph.SRhep-phJ.Phys.G(2023)·6 citations
  2. 02

    Laboratory electron screening in nuclear resonant reactions

    Christian Iliadis

    Both nonresonant and resonance reaction data are subject to laboratory electron screening effects. For nonresonant reactions, such effects are well documented and the measured cross sections can be corrected to find the unscreened ones. Frequently, the procedure and expression to calculate laboratory electron screening factors for nonresonant reactions are also applied to isolated narrow resonances, without much theoretical support or experimental evidence. A simple model is applied to estimate electron screening factors, lengths, and potentials for narrow resonances. The corrections to the measured data result in an enhancement of the unscreened resonance strengths by less than 0.2%, contrary to published narrow-resonance screening correction factors, which predict a reduction of the unscreened strengths by up to 25%. Unless it can be proven otherwise, it is recommended that measured strengths of isolated narrow resonances not be corrected for laboratory electron screening. The prospects of investigating laboratory electron screening effects by measuring almost negligible differences in resonance strengths are not promising. Instead, the difference of the resonance energy for the unscreened and screened situation may be measurable. As an example, the case of the E_cm = 956-keV resonance in the 27Al(p,gamma)28Si reaction is discussed. It is also demonstrated that the claim of a previously reported detection of a resonance near 800 keV in the 176Lu(p,n)176}Hf reaction is incorrect.

    nucl-thPRC(2023)·11 citations

Affiliations

first authorsco-authorsvia INSPIRE