arXiv:1910.07644·v1·Nuclear Theory
Reply to the Comment of S. Ayik and D. Lacroix, posted as arXiv:1909.1361v1, on the recent article "Fission Dynamics of 240Pu from Saddle-to-Scission and Beyond" by Bulgac et al, published as Phys. Rev. C 100, 034615 (2019)
Abstract
A point-by-point answer to the comment authored by S. Ayik and D. Lacroix is presented. At this point in time this text is not aimed at being submitted to Phys. Rev. C or any other journal, unless the authors of the comment choose to follow such an avenue. I also suggest a possible formulation of a stochastic mean field approach free of the difficulties in the stochastic mean field model due to S. Ayik.
Comments: 6 pages