arXiv:1404.5466·v2·Nuclear Theory
Multidimensionally-constrained relativistic mean-field study of triple-humped barriers in actinides
Jie Zhao · Bing-Nan Lu · Dario Vretenar · En-Guang Zhao · Shan-Gui Zhou
Abstract
Potential energy surfaces (PES's) of actinide nuclei are characterized by a two-humped barrier structure. At large deformations beyond the second barrier the occurrence of a third one was predicted by Mic-Mac model calculations in the 1970s, but contradictory results were later reported. In this paper, triple-humped barriers in actinide nuclei are investigated with covariant density functional theory (CDFT). Calculations are performed using the multidimensionally-constrained relativistic mean field (MDC-RMF) model, with functionals PC-PK1 and DD-ME2. Pairing correlations are treated in the BCS approximation with a separable pairing force of finite range. Two-dimensional PES's of Th and U are mapped and the third minima on these surfaces are located. Then one-dimensional potential energy curves along the fission path are analyzed in detail and the energies of the second barrier, the third minimum, and the third barrier are determined. DD-ME2 predicts the occurrence of a third barrier in all Th nuclei and U. The third minima in Th are very shallow, whereas those in Th and U are quite prominent. With PC-PK1 a third barrier is found only in Th. Single-nucleon levels around the Fermi surface are analyzed in Th, and it is found that the formation of the third minimum is mainly due to the proton energy gap at and . The possible occurrence of a third barrier in actinide nuclei depends on the effective interaction used in multidimensional CDFT calculations. More pronounced minima are predicted by the DD-ME2 functional, as compared to the functional PC-PK1. The depth of the third well in Th isotopes decreases with increasing neutron number. The origin of the third minimum is due to the proton shell gap at relevant deformations.
Comments: 10 pages, 7 figures; Phys. Rev. C, in press; due to the limitation "The abstract field cannot be longer than 1,920 characters", the abstract appearing here is slightly shorter than that in the PDF file