PaperPanorama
FAQ

Nuclear Theory·nucl-th

Wednesday·June 15, 2022

5 papers—2 primary·3 cross-listed

All5Primary2Cross-lists3
  1. 03

    Proton and neutron exchange as a prelude to fusion at near-barrier energies

    J.E. Johnstone🇺🇸 · Varinderjit Singh🇺🇸 · R. Giri🇺🇸 · S. Hudan🇺🇸 · J. Vadas🇺🇸 · R.T. deSouza🇺🇸 · D. Ackermann🇫🇷 · A. Chbihi🇫🇷 · Q. Hourdille🇫🇷 · A. Abbott🇺🇸 · C. Balhoff🇺🇸 · A. Hannaman🇺🇸 and 11 other authors

    Systematic examination of fusion for K + Si and Ar + Si provides insight into the impact of neutron and proton exchange on fusion for nuclei at and near the N=20 and N=28 shells. Comparison of the reduced excitation functions reveals a marked difference between the behavior of open-shell and closed-shell systems. While coupled channels calculations provide a good description for the closed-shell nuclei they significantly under-predict the fusion cross-section for open-shell nuclei. The observed trends are examined in the context of a potential energy surface, including shell effects, and multi-nucleon exchange with consideration of Pauli-blocking.

    ↳ nucl-exnucl-thPRC(2022)·4 citations
  2. 04

    Relations for low-energy coupling constants in baryon chiral perturbation theory derived from the chiral quark model

    Jun Jiang🇨🇳 · Shao-Zhou Jiang🇨🇳 · Shi-Yuan Li🇨🇳 · Yan-Rui Liu🇨🇳 · Zong-Guo Si🇨🇳 · Hong-Qian Wang🇨🇳

    The quark model symmetry can be adopted to establish relations between the low-energy constants (LECs) in the baryon chiral perturbation theory () if one assumes that a baryon-baryon-meson coupling is described equivalently by a quark-quark-meson coupling at the quark level. Through the correspondence between the description and the description for the same coupling vertex at the quark level, we find some relations between the LECs in and up to the third chiral order. The LEC relations at the same order are also obtained. The numerical analysis roughly supports these relations. In the situation that the available experimental data are not enough, one may employ such constraints to reduce the number of LECs.

    ↳ hep-phhep-latnucl-thPRD(2022)·4 citations
  3. 05

    On Ambiguity of Definition of Shear and Spin-Hall Contributions to Polarization in Heavy-Ion Collisions

    Yu. B. Ivanov🇷🇺 · A. A. Soldatov🇷🇺

    Recently proposed thermal-shear and spin-Hall contributions to the particle polarization in heavy-ion collisions are discussed. Alternative definitions of the thermal-shear contribution, i.e. those of Becattini-Buzzegoli-Palermo on the one hand and Liu-Yin on the other, are very similar in the midrapidity region while quite different at forward-backward rapidities, which are measured in fixed-target experiments. It is shown that the thermal-shear contribution to the global polarization with momentum averaging extended to all momenta is very different within these alternative definitions. The spin-Hall contribution to the global polarization, defined similarly to the Liu-Yin shear one, is identically zero, if averaging runs over all momenta. Only application of restrictive momentum acceptance and the boost (to rest frame) correction result in nonzero global spin-Hall polarization. If the spin-Hall contribution were defined similarly to Becattini-Buzzegoli-Palermo shear one, the global spin-Hall polarization would be non-zero even without any acceptance and the boost correction.

    ↳ hep-phnucl-thPisma Zh.Eksp.Teor.Fiz.(2022)·6 citations

Affiliations

first authorsco-authorsvia INSPIRE